Invasion of personal liberty ?

Gastro

Commando
Eeek - Scameras are here in the UK to identify your face not just your car... :eek:

Speed cameras are being developed that recognise your face -- and if you're in London or Essex, you should worry because that's where the first ones are being installed.

Scameras have traditionally been focused on the car, and the law has relied on drivers identifying themselves. It's led to civil liberties groups arguing that this process violates human rights, one of whose principles is it's for the authorities to prove a case against an alleged criminal, not for citizens to incriminate themselves.

That could be all in the past, however, as The Times reports today that police are about to install new technology that will be able to capture an image of the driver's face. It's designed to solve what the police call the growing problem of drivers passing-off penalty points to others with the aim of avoiding penalty points on their driving licences. Stats suggest that there are 160,000 drivers with nine or more points whose incentive to pass off points would be great.

The new camera will allow police to investigate further if they believe that a passing off attempt is being made in such circumstances. They may even come round to your house to take a look.

Already, the Essex camera partnership has trialled the device, which is made by Gatso. According to the report, some 1,000 cases have been identified where the driver attempted to pass off points.

London's partnership is installing some in Lower Thames Street, and Derbyshire has, apparently, shown an interest, and they will soon spread across the country.

So when you're driving, not only will your car be identifiable, soon you will be too -- whether or not you have points on your licence or you're breaking the speed limit. There appears to be no end to the extent to which our authorities, who are spending our money after all, are prepared to go to invade the privacy of the country's citizens.
 
We should all wear wooly hats so we can pull them down over our faces when you see a camera...:out

This Country spends far too much time on the wrong things...:out
 
Nobody talks abot it in Holland, but I'm sure they're experimenting with it over here too :scared: There is a camera alongside the motorway in between Utrecht and Amsterdam that is directed towards drivers at about 1.5 meters height.. :(
 
ADJ said:
Too right....... they have their priorities arse backwards :out

No thats me (and that is called invasion believe me).......... get back on topic :D
 
Last edited:
Whilst this topic has been brought back up @cyberkryten, is it correct that come Jan 1st next year all telephone conversations over 10 mins will be automatically stored for 3 months with gov orgs having unrestricted access upon request?
 
If you drive a car today - you're treated like a criminal anyway...

An endless source of revenue/taxes...

Facial recognition is already being used - I for one don't have an issue with it. As with all new technologies - there will be errors (possible with the technology, but more likely with the process and the imbeciles that implement it)...

I say bring it on....and bring in National ID cards...
 
Right. They are already doing it and no time limit basis!

Alledgedly. Tbh no idea but GCHQ give no fucks.

I thought by being blunt in my reply it would avoid the side-eyes glances and nudge-wink asides of what is/isn't happening <sigh>

Whilst there are indeed provisions to allow access in certain cases, the idea that anyone is ingesting the entirety of audio conversations, internet usage etc for analysis is utter bollocks, perpetuated by conspiracy nutters and click baiting engagement farmers, all of whom are making $$$ by peddling this bullshit to the gullible masses who seem to think that their private lives are just so bloody interesting that the govt want to hear all about it...
 
I thought by being blunt in my reply it would avoid the side-eyes glances and nudge-wink asides of what is/isn't happening <sigh>

Whilst there are indeed provisions to allow access in certain cases, the idea that anyone is ingesting the entirety of audio conversations, internet usage etc for analysis is utter bollocks, perpetuated by conspiracy nutters and click baiting engagement farmers, all of whom are making $$$ by peddling this bullshit to the gullible masses who seem to think that their private lives are just so bloody interesting that the govt want to hear all about it...
Well you would say that!!!
 
I thought by being blunt in my reply it would avoid the side-eyes glances and nudge-wink asides of what is/isn't happening <sigh>

Whilst there are indeed provisions to allow access in certain cases, the idea that anyone is ingesting the entirety of audio conversations, internet usage etc for analysis is utter bollocks, perpetuated by conspiracy nutters and click baiting engagement farmers, all of whom are making $$$ by peddling this bullshit to the gullible masses who seem to think that their private lives are just so bloody interesting that the govt want to hear all about it...

What are your thoughts on the EU CSAM?

Again, like the Online safety Act in the UK appears to be a noble cause but with far reaching power to step beyond its intended target audience.

Screen Shot 2025-08-16 at 20.45.07.png




All ^ probably conspiracy nutters and click baiting engagement farmers but maybe worth discussing?
 
Back
Top